CraftedTemplate
Blog GitHub Pages vs Vercel: Which Is Better for Hosting React and Static Sites?

GitHub Pages vs Vercel: Which Is Better for Hosting React and Static Sites?

11/3/2025 • Festus Ayomike
GitHub Pages vs Vercel: Which Is Better for Hosting React and Static Sites?

When it comes to hosting frontend projects, two platforms regularly stand out — GitHub Pages and Vercel. Both are popular among developers for deploying static or framework-based sites quickly.

However, they cater to different needs:

  • GitHub Pages is a straightforward, free hosting service tightly integrated with GitHub repositories.
  • Vercel, created by the team behind Next.js, offers advanced features like serverless functions, edge deployment, and automatic scaling.

This guide compares their speed, pricing, features, and developer experience to help you choose the right one for your next project.

See Also: Cloudflare Pages vs Netlify: Which Is Better for Static and Jamstack Hosting?

GitHub Pages vs Vercel

FeatureGitHub PagesVercel
Hosting TypeStatic hosting (HTML, CSS, JS only)Static & dynamic hosting with Edge and Functions
Deployment WorkflowGit push to main branchGit integration with auto deploys & previews
Framework SupportJekyll natively; others via build stepFull support for React, Next.js, Svelte, etc.
Free Tier & Pricing100% free, limited bandwidthFree tier + usage-based Pro plans
PerformanceBasic CDN via GitHub’s networkGlobal edge network optimized for speed
Best ForSimple static sites, portfolios, docsModern frameworks & production-grade apps

Hosting & Performance

GitHub Pages was built for static websites — it serves prebuilt HTML, CSS, and JS directly from your repo’s /docs folder or gh-pages branch.

It’s perfect for portfolios, project documentation, and personal blogs. Performance is reliable but basic — it doesn’t support serverless functions or dynamic rendering.

Vercel, on the other hand, delivers content through a global edge network optimized for performance. It supports both static and hybrid rendering (ISR, SSR) and provides Edge Functions for dynamic logic.

If you’re running a Next.js site or any React-based SPA, Vercel automatically optimizes builds and caching out of the box.

See Also: Netlify vs Vercel: Which Is Better for React & Next.js

Developer Experience

GitHub Pages shines for simplicity. You can deploy a site directly from your repository — no dashboard required. It’s integrated tightly with GitHub Actions, so you can automate builds with workflows that publish static files on push.

Vercel, however, focuses on automation and developer productivity. With just one click, you can connect a GitHub repo, and every branch or pull request automatically generates a preview deployment.

Its dashboard provides build logs, analytics, environment variable management, and instant rollbacks. For teams building modern web apps, this seamless workflow saves hours.

Pricing and Scalability

GitHub Pages is completely free — no usage fees, bandwidth charges, or tier limits. That said, it has restrictions:

  • No built-in analytics
  • Limited to static content (no backend or dynamic rendering)
  • No custom CI/CD beyond GitHub Actions

Vercel offers a free tier suitable for personal projects, and its Pro and Enterprise plans add enhanced bandwidth, analytics, and team collaboration features. It scales automatically as traffic grows, making it better for production-grade apps that demand uptime and flexibility.

See Also: Hosting Cost Comparison: Free vs Paid vs Cloud

Framework and Integration Support

GitHub Pages supports Jekyll out of the box, but you can host other static frameworks (like Astro, Hugo, or Gatsby) by building them locally and pushing the output. For React and Next.js, you’ll need a manual build pipeline with GitHub Actions.

Vercel detects frameworks automatically — React, Next.js, SvelteKit, Nuxt, Remix, Astro, and more. It provides zero-config builds, routing, and environment variable management. For most modern web stacks, Vercel “just works.”

Pros and Cons

GitHub Pages – Pros

  • 100% free hosting for static sites
  • Simple setup and Git-based deployment
  • Perfect for documentation and portfolios

GitHub Pages – Cons

  • No serverless or backend support
  • Manual build setup for most frameworks
  • Basic performance and analytics

Vercel – Pros

  • Edge-optimized global performance
  • Automatic deploy previews and rollbacks
  • Built-in support for frameworks like Next.js
  • Serverless functions and environment management

Vercel – Cons

  • Usage-based billing at scale
  • Overkill for simple static sites

Verdict

If you want a lightweight, free option to host static HTML, CSS, or documentation, GitHub Pages remains unbeatable for simplicity and reliability. But if you’re building React or Next.js applications that require speed, scalability, and modern developer tools, Vercel is the superior choice.

In short:

  • Choose GitHub Pages for simplicity, open-source projects, or documentation.
  • Choose Vercel for production apps with dynamic rendering, previews, and edge performance.